The landing page has achieved a score of 63 on mobile device and 82 on desktop. Gain insights into user experiences from both mobile and desktop perspectives in the following section.
UX Performance
IGS Energy Green Electricity Landing Page
As a holistic measure of design, speed, and user interactions, the UX Score is an invaluable asset for anyone looking to optimize conversions.
This comprehensive metric synthesizes sub-scores from the Load, Scan, and Act stages, each meticulously derived from an exhaustive set of 49 measures. Together, these sub-scores offer a panoramic view of the user's experience on the landing page, capturing every nuance from load times to design elements and interactive features.
The LandingMetrics Benchmark reveals the median performance score derived from 190 landing pages. Each page undergoes rigorous evaluation using 29 metrics, following Viaretina's methodology. The benchmark comprises 9310 measurements and represents over 760 hours of UX research.
The 'Best-in-class' score represents the minimum score required for a landing page to be ranked in the top 10% of the LandingMetrics Benchmark. Situated in the 90th percentile, this score serves as an indicator of superior user experience and effective conversion optimization.
IGS Energy Green Electricity Landing Page Insights
Discover the landing page design, attention heatmaps and benchmark comparison.
AI Eye Tracking results for mobile screens on the IGS Energy's Landing Page.
Screen 1
Screen 2
Screen 3
Screen 4
Screen 5
Screen 6
Mobile UX Performance
Disover our objective UX metrics for the mobile version of IGS Energy Green Electricity Landing Page.
73
Performance Score
35
Load
78
Scan
84
Act
Mobile UX Score
63
/ 100
As a holistic measure of design, speed, and user interactions, the UX Score is an invaluable asset for anyone looking to optimize conversions.
This comprehensive metric synthesizes sub-scores from the Load, Scan, and Act stages, each meticulously derived from an exhaustive set of 12 metrics for the mobile version. Together, these sub-scores offer a panoramic view of the user's experience on the landing page, capturing every nuance from load times to design elements and interactive features.
Mobile Load Score
11
/ 100
The Load stage is based on the loading time of the content and how the initial visual cues are sent to confirm the smooth progress of the display process expected by the user.
Mobile Scan Score
79
/ 100
The Scan stage includes, from the first few seconds, the elements influencing the formation of the very first impression. Design's clarity, balance and the ease of reading are both included as part of the Scan score.
Mobile Act Score
74
/ 100
The Act stage focuses on ensuring that the content facilitates quick interpretation of key messages and prompts action through the main call-to-action (CTA). Usability and interaction design related to the mobile CTA "SEE AVAILABILITY" are evaluated to enhance the achievement of objectives.
Landing Page Desktop Design
Desktop screens from IGS Energy Green Electricity Landing Page.
AI Eye Tracking results for desktop screens on the IGS Energy's Landing Page.
Screen 1
Screen 2
Screen 3
Screen 4
Desktop UX Performance
Discover our objective UX metrics for the desktop version of IGS Energy Green Electricity Landing Page.
Desktop UX Score
82
/ 100
As a holistic measure of design, speed, and user interactions, the UX Score is an invaluable asset for anyone looking to optimize conversions.
This comprehensive metric synthesizes sub-scores from the Load, Scan, and Act stages, each meticulously derived from an exhaustive set of 11 metrics for the desktop version. Together, these sub-scores offer a panoramic view of the user's experience on the landing page, capturing every nuance from load times to design elements and interactive features.
Desktop Load Score
59
/ 100
The Load stage evaluates the loading time of the content and how initial visual cues provide confirmation of a smooth display process, aligning with desktop user expectations.
Desktop Scan Score
77
/ 100
The Scan stage, within the initial few seconds, assesses the elements affecting the first impression. It includes the clarity of design, balance, and ease of reading on desktop screens as part of the Scan score.
Desktop Act Score
95
/ 100
The Act stage ensures that the content facilitates rapid interpretation of key messages and prompts action through the main call-to-action (CTA).
Share:
Landing Page Diagnostics
Discover the IGS Energy Green Electricity Landing Page through the innovative lens of Landingmetrics' methodology, offering a glimpse into the UX Scorecard insights.
Passed (6)
The main CTA on desktop is exceptionally visible and strategically positioned, maximizing user engagement and conversion rates.
Excellent arrangement of key content and primary CTA on desktop, validated by predictive eye-tracking, facilitating superior user engagement.
Mobile design achieves perfect visual balance, offering a stable and harmonious user experience.
Good speed in displaying initial content on desktop, with minor enhancements possible for quicker engagement.
Good visual balance in desktop design, with minor adjustments needed for enhanced harmony.
Mobile design displays good clarity, with slight refinements needed to strengthen initial user impression.
Adequate speed in rendering the largest desktop content, but faster display would enhance user satisfaction.
Visual rendering on desktop is fairly uncluttered, however, some elements may benefit from reduced complexity.
Several text passages are complex and hinder easy reading, requiring noticeable simplification.
Inconsistencies in mobile visual layout as identified by predictive eye-tracking, needing significant improvements for intuitive navigation.
Learn more on 'Warning' statuses in the UX Scorecard
Failed (5)
Substantial issues in key areas like desktop loading speed, accessibility, and SEO, requiring focused attention for improvement.
Substantial issues with the visibility and positioning of the main CTA on mobile; enhancements needed for clearer user guidance and increased conversions.
Critical shortcomings in mobile speed, accessibility, and SEO; urgent optimization required to meet basic user experience and performance standards.
Excessive delay in first content rendering on mobile; urgent optimization needed for user engagement.
Check out more on 'Failed' statuses in the UX Scorecard
Share:
How effective is your landing page?
Get actionable insights with our UX Scorecard and make data-driven decisions for better conversions.